by Matthew Gutowski – Phase III
I think all of us, in fact humanity in general, are in constant pursuit of answers.. “What is this made of?”, “Where did that come from?” ..”Why are we here?” ..but more pertinently for us in the context of what we are doing here.. “How does that feel?”, and if we look at what that implies in its entirety, then “why does that feel?” also seems more than applicable..
-------
Space.. the final frontier?

I don’t think so. As interesting as I find space and the stars and the universe and how it all came about, I can’t help but feeling that no matter how unfathomable, immense and mysterious it all seems, it pales in comparison to the infinite possibilities within us, within our minds, our feelings, interpretations.. infinity in its broadest sense ..a truly undefinable ‘frontier’
So where does that leave me and my direction.. good question.. does anyone know where any of us are headed, or do we just GRAB on to the back of a passing path like the waterskiier behind the boat and just get ‘dragged’ along because we were at the correct place at the correct time to be able to grab on to its flailing handle…
Time to be a little less ambiguous..
Touch seems to be a sense with sub-sense, in that its function is not relegated to or as I like to look at it, restricted to just one Modus Operandi i.e. not just one particular function or goal. It is ignorantly referred to as just touch, whereas it encompasses a plethora of sensory and operational duties. Funnily enough touch can be stripped back to a raw scientific analysis. In essence the core definition of what touch is defined as, as an action, is two bodies coming into contact with each other. In science, when any two bodies come in contact with each other there is always, ALWAYS, a transfer of energy.
What has always fascinated me, and having its roots in ancient spirituality and many religions and cultures(American Indian, Buddhist etc) is that every single object contains an energy, something that can be felt depending on how in tune or ‘open’ one is to that level of awareness and depending on how we look at it, this feeling, this inner recognition of energy can also be defined as a sense.. to be touched etheraly to some is as vivid and engaging an experience(even more so sometimes) than physical contact. These two forms of touch though can be and are quite frequently juxtaposed.. becoming synesthetically parallel you could say. We feel this every day, when picking up an old heirloom from a dearly departed grandparent and feeling emotions related to our experience of them. Like a smell evokes a particular memory of a distant place or time, thus does an object infused with an intangible, unmanufacturable ‘value’, possibly through having belonged to someone special, or been from a particularly significant time, place or event in history.
We see this ‘infusion’ very frequently with musical instruments. You might go to a museum in Europe and see ‘Mozart’s Piano’. It of course is a man-made product, probably exactly like hundreds of other pianos from the late 1700’s, but the amount of energy that has passed through Mozart’s piano is immesurable, as is the type of energy, and that artefact has forever been infused with a ‘value’. Another interesting parallel with music and the instruments used to play and create it is how instrumental the sense of touch is to the emotion of the sound, the musician or user actually feels the sound through the way he/she touches the input receptacles of the instrument and this is directly reflected in the emotive index of the resulting music. Playing music in itself is a direct representation of a mass conversion of energy and emotion in one.
So… things to investigate are:
Qualities that cant be manufactured
Old jeans, wooden artefacts etc
How can something get ‘better’ as it gets older’
Photo-synthesis – conversion of energy
Value coming from what an object represents
User feeling a sense of worth
(trying to steer away from the materialistic nature of ‘worth’ with this), sense of accomplishment
visual expression of personal music
(visually opening up personal space without actually inviting its violation, just)
sensory deprivation in relation to touch
The evolution of personal music(and technology in general) seems to be also directly in proportion to the amount of isolation in our society. I think it would be interesting to look at ‘opening up’ that personal space that the headphone now give everyone, possibly visually with a link to the music being listened to, without actually taking away that personal space and security in a sense, but allowing it to be shared unobtrusively. The silent but just as acknowledgeable Ghetto-Blaster .
Other parallels that I have drawn with sound and instruments and very much touch, is with incorporating the element of time. By comparison in the sense of an engine or machine, being operated or on for a long time, getting hotter and more worn the longer it is being used.. this notion would be interesting if incorporated with music and sound in a way that the instrument is the machine, and its heat can be interpreted by the sense of touch, or visually by becoming redder, a colour we associate with heat and interestingly subsequently, longer(as opposed to shorter) periods of time. This would again be yet another tool to demonstrate or at least investigate the multi-faceted-ness of our sense of touch, and possibly what it means to us, our interaction with our environments, people, also products… and how we would use or interact with objects if we had that sense removed(thus confusing associations) from the equation i.e. the interaction experience/exercise.
If I was to cumulate my thoughts, ideas and findings in a product(as i am hoping to) ..it may very well turn out to be a kind of ‘anti’-synesthetic emotive device.. taking away perhaps more than one of our senses, in a less conventional or direct fashion, and induce disorientation and in a sense a greater respect for the senses that we take for granted in our daily transgression and basic function(especially that of the more complex touch) ..but then again, that wouldn’t necessarily be a bad thing..
----------------------------------------------------
Someone once said
“Dream is destiny...”
Absolutely,
so to that I add..
“Be your own altruist”
----------------------------------------------------